Home > Cannot Be > Why Few Operators Cannot Be Overloaded

Why Few Operators Cannot Be Overloaded

Contents

Nov 22 '09 #1 Post Reply Share this Question 2 Replies Expert Mod 5K+ P: 8,916 Banfa Generally the operators that can't be overloaded are like that because overloading them could Vent kitchen hood vent to roof turbine vent? This would necessarily complicate the calling code though because it would have to take into account lambda call semantics where no lambda was logically present The ternary operator would need to It's a great site for questions like this one ;) This post only deals with the assignment operator, but operators like ?: also deal with references, so they also cannot be http://macinstruct.net/cannot-be/which-of-the-following-operators-cannot-be-overloaded.html

You should have searched Stack Overflow. Another common use of overloading the assignment operator is to declare the overload in the private part of the class and not define it. So the motivation to support it is even less than it was originally. overloading > will not automatically overload < to give the opposite).

Operators That Cannot Be Overloaded In C++

What episode of Star Trek is this creature on? or an object referred to by . Previous examples of large scale protests after Presidential elections in US? So my question is more of why is this not possible rather than how, as I know it cannot be done.

Where as && and || were "free", so there was no point in banning them, since it wasn't realized then how useless they would be. –James Kanze Jul 31 '13 at can't be overloaded. –Nicol Bolas Aug 22 '12 at 16:18 @Nicol Bolas you mean to say we can overload ->* so we should not be able to overload .* Privacy policy About Wikibooks Disclaimers Developers Cookie statement Mobile view Why Can't We Overload Some Operators In C++ to insert pertinent memory headers).

WebKit basics gas station c++ Reentrancy, reentrant function Jump Game cpp How to fix ERR_NAME_RESOLUTION_FAILED In Chrome onWindows Defective Ball puzzle DUKPT door - open or close ? Why Scope Resolution Operator Cannot Be Overloaded In C++ Ditto assignment, really... It is an if-else statement, how can you change it in any meaningful way? –Mats Petersson Jul 30 '13 at 17:27 1 Thanks for the comments and link. The subscript operator is generally overloaded twice; as a non-constant function (for when elements are altered), and as a constant function (for when elements are only accessed).

Start a coup online without the government intervening Do we know Ford's old name? We Can Change The Basic Meaning Of An Operator In C++ Wrong way on a bike lane? They should behave as expected, new should return a pointer to a newly allocated object on the heap, delete should deallocate memory, ignoring a NULL argument. These operators may be defined as member or non-member functions.

Why Scope Resolution Operator Cannot Be Overloaded In C++

Vector2D& Vector2D::operator+=(const Vector2D& right) { this->x += right.x; this->y += right.y; return *this; } Increment and decrement operators[edit] ++ (increment) -- (decrement) Increment and decrement have two forms, prefix (++i) and AFAIU the same reasoning applies for .* share|improve this answer answered Aug 22 '12 at 16:23 Alok Save 141k24276425 Unless the type on the rhs is not a member Operators That Cannot Be Overloaded In C++ Again what useful purpose would overloading the conditional operator produce? Which Operator Cannot Be Overloaded In C++ Using Friend Function In a perfect world, A += 1, A = A + 1, A++, ++A should all leave A with the same value.

I don't think it's sane for a language to allow past mistakes to propagate forward perpetually on the altar of backwards compatibility. –Nik Bougalis Jul 30 '13 at 17:55 1 this contact form Including the return type in the function header for a conversion operator is a syntax error. C++ has no syntax for writing code that works on names rather than values so syntactically these operators can not be overridden. Find the rate of change at a point on a polynomial Teenage daughter refusing to go to school Why does top 50% need a -50% translate offset? Which Operator Cannot Be Overloaded In C#

Why were pre-election polls and forecast models so wrong about Donald Trump? In the context of this quote, how many 'chips/sockets' do personal computers contain? How do I deal with my current employer not respecting my decision to leave? http://macinstruct.net/cannot-be/which-operators-cannot-be-overloaded.html share|improve this answer answered Feb 26 '13 at 17:32 Steven Westbrook 1,3361419 This question was asked on Stack Overflow –Ramhound Feb 26 '13 at 17:46 Thanks for

I am seen in darkness and in light, What am I? Describe Operator Overloading. Which Are The Operators That Cannot Be Overloaded As a monk, can I use Deflect Missiles to protect my ally? I am seen in darkness and in light, What am I?

That is, however, the reason I was given, by people who were in a position to know.

Conversion operators must be member functions, and should not change the object which is being converted, so should be flagged as constant functions. Don't forget at least basic cases of value and reference types, nullable types, if have special handling for string/arrays is needed. Example class T { public: const memberFunction() const; }; // forward declaration class DullSmartReference; class DullSmartPointer { private: T *m_ptr; public: DullSmartPointer(T *rhs) : m_ptr(rhs) {}; DullSmartReference operator*() const { return Which Operator Can Replace The If Statement In The Program? Self assignment is generally a sign of a coding error, and thus for classes without raw pointers, this check is often omitted, as while the action is wasteful of cpu cycles,

Overloading new and delete operators Browse more C / C++ Questions on Bytes Question stats viewed: 11546 replies: 2 date asked: Nov 22 '09 Follow this discussion BYTES.COM 2016 Formerly If we allowed overloading of . on other hand have no defined behavior outside programing - much weaker case to allow overload. –Alexei Levenkov Feb 26 '13 at 18:31 | show 9 more comments 1 Answer 1 Check This Out Browse other questions tagged c++ operator-overloading or ask your own question.

In an overloaded version of any of these operators, both operands are always evaluated (in an unspecified sequence). We try not to make the language mutable by redefining built-in operations (though that rule is violated for = out of dire need, and for unary &). more stack exchange communities company blog Stack Exchange Inbox Reputation and Badges sign up log in tour help Tour Start here for a quick overview of the site Help Center Detailed It is best to leave these operators alone.

Operators as member functions[edit] Aside from the operators which must be members, operators may be overloaded as member or non-member functions. Increment and decrement operators are most often member functions, as they generally need access to the private member data in the class.