Home > Cannot Be > Why Some Operators Cannot Be Overloaded

Why Some Operators Cannot Be Overloaded


It's quick & easy. a+b must mean either operator+(a,b) or a.operator+(b), whichever exists, because there is no built-in meaning of + for arbitrary objects. share|improve this answer edited Jan 27 '13 at 15:56 leemes 27.1k1168131 answered Feb 6 '09 at 12:09 ddaa 29.7k63652 add a comment| up vote 27 down vote Stroustrup has an answer If you want to achieve the effect of overloading operator bool pre-C++0x, you should google the 'safe bool idiom'. –Omnifarious Mar 15 '11 at 18:15 add a comment| up vote 0 http://macinstruct.net/cannot-be/which-of-the-following-operators-cannot-be-overloaded.html

Answer should be complete in itself. Including the return type in the function header for a conversion operator is a syntax error. Answers should not be the repeat of same answer, already approved. Operators should only be overloaded where their use would be natural and unambiguous, and they should perform as expected.

Operators That Cannot Be Overloaded In C++

Since one is already allowed, then disallowing the other makes sense, and avoids lots of problem! –Nawaz Mar 15 '11 at 18:05 4 @TommyA: It allows a smart pointer object For operator . it cannot change the basic operations it performs or to create new operators Dheeraj Can dynamic_cast be overloaded? Redefining operators in C++ Operators that cannot be Overloaded - WHY?

What is Big Data Analytics? What do I do? Thanks http://www.research.att.com/~bs/bs_f...l#overload-dot Jul 26 '05 #2 P: n/a Ian Bangalore wrote: Hi, Can anybody explain , why some operators(::, ., .*, sizeof,?:) cannot be overloaded in C++? Which Operator Cannot Be Overloaded In C# These operators may be defined as member or non-member functions.

The exceptions are

. (dot) :: ?: sizeof

There is no fundamental reason to disallow overloading of ?:. What is the use of copy constructor? What is the impact of Big Data on Education Industry? At the time of standardization, it was not obvious which way would be best.

and a pony. –Anycorn Mar 15 '11 at 18:02 | show 10 more comments 6 Answers 6 active oldest votes up vote 16 down vote accepted To quote Bjarne Stroustrup: There We Can Change The Basic Meaning Of An Operator In C++ You can overload operator-> and operator* but not operator. Relational operators[edit] == (equality) != (inequality) > (greater-than) < (less-than) >= (greater-than-or-equal-to) <= (less-than-or-equal-to) All relational operators are binary, and should return either true or false. For example: class Y { public: void f(); // ... }; class X { // assume that you can overload .

Why Scope Resolution Operator Cannot Be Overloaded In C++

Nov 23 '09 #3 reply Message Cancel Changes Post your reply Join Now >> Sign in to post your reply or Sign up for a free account. Notify me of new posts by email. Operators That Cannot Be Overloaded In C++ Browse other questions tagged c++ operator-overloading or ask your own question. Why Can't We Overload Some Operators In C++ The!

View Answer Can you explain the term "resource acquisition is initialization?" - Operators in C++ Interview Questions & Answers"> View Answer What is the difference between operator new and the new this contact form have no predefined precedence.And if we want to overload these operator then compiler does not understand and conflicts, and generates an error. How does Gandalf end up on the roof of Isengard? What does a Big Data analyst do? Which Operator Cannot Be Overloaded In C++ Using Friend Function

Scope resolution and member access operators work on names rather than values. Is it possible to check where an alias was defined? vtable cpp dynamic linking Csharp concepts Manually verify PKCS#7 self signed data OpenSSL Memory allocation deallocation 2d array Health tips Function pointers and functor Recent Posts DUKPT Respirator Mask Be healthy have a peek here Member Reference operators[edit] The two member access operators, operator->() and operator->*() can be overloaded.

Memory management operators[edit] new (allocate memory for object) new[ ] (allocate memory for array) delete (deallocate memory for object) delete[ ] (deallocate memory for array) The memory management operators can be Describe Operator Overloading. Which Are The Operators That Cannot Be Overloaded How Can We Cope with the Impact of Big Data? Suresh Well it is certainly a good policy not to allow things which make no sence.

Because operator has been overloaded as member function, it can access private fields.

Can we overload *_cast<> operators? and operator.* which is why allowing it is seriously considered for the next version of C++ see: http://www.open-std.org/JTC1/SC22/WG...2004/n1671.pdf It is usful to implement smart references or other forwarding handles. Hot Network Questions Sharepoint 2013: Rest API - does header need to include X-RequestDigest? Which Operator Can Replace The If Statement In The Program? All the math and boolean operators are there to be able to make your own numeric classes.

Polyglot Anagrams Cops' Thread How to capture disk usage percentage of a partition as an integer? What is the impact of Big Data on Information Technology Industry? Say Complex C1(10,20),C2(10,2) // we assume there is an already a two argument constructor within class. http://macinstruct.net/cannot-be/which-operators-cannot-be-overloaded.html But according to Stroustrup he thought of several sensible resolutions for operator.

What is the impact of Big Data on Technology Industry? If you overload both (. Load New Code Enter the above shown code: * Inform me about updated answers to this question Related Questions View Answer What is a scope resolution operator? is an explicit parallel with operator->.

View Answer How can you overload a method? etc... The prefix version in general should return a reference to the changed object. Vector2D Vector2D::operator+(const Vector2D& right) { Vector2D result; result.set_x(x() + right.x()); result.set_y(y() + right.y()); return result; } It is good style to only overload these operators to perform their customary arithmetic operation.

The postfix version should just return a copy of the original value. syntax for overloading operators What operators cannot be virtual? For example: class Y { public: void f(); // ... }; class X { // assume that you can overload . Answer: The restriction is for safety.For example if we overload .

up vote 59 down vote favorite 7 It would be very useful to be able to overload the . A compound assignment operator should work as expected: A @= B should be equivalent to A = A @ B. What is the impact of Big Data on Sports Industry? Source: CoolInterview.com Answered by: Hitesh | Date: 3/7/2010 | Contact Hitesh these type of operator don't there own value,but in overloading not change there own value while overloading that's why if

An example of += for a two-dimensional mathematical vector type follows. Vector2D& Vector2D::operator+=(const Vector2D& right) { this->x += right.x; this->y += right.y; return *this; } Increment and decrement operators[edit] ++ (increment) -- (decrement) Increment and decrement have two forms, prefix (++i) and Even if it was pointer arithmetic relies on the correct value being returned by this operator since the compiler already knows how to calculate the correct value all overloading would do It should be noted that these operators have a lower precedence than the arithmetic operators, so if ^ were to be overloaded for exponentiation, x ^ y + z may not

Category Operators in C++ Interview Questions & Answers - Exam Mode / Learning Mode Rating (3.5) By 97 users Added on 8/18/2011 Views 6059 Rate it! * * * * *